The 14 best Jira alternatives for 2027

Comparing the top Jira alternatives for 2027: 1. Computer, by DevRev, 2. Linear, 3. ClickUp, 4. Asana, 5. Monday.com, 6. Shortcut, 7. Wrike, 8. Zoho Sprints, 9. Notion, 10. Azure DevOps, 11. Trello, 12. Smartsheet, 13. Basecamp, 14. Zoho Projects.

In September 2025, Atlassian announced that Jira Data Center would reach end of life on March 28, 2029.

As of March 30, 2026, Atlassian stopped selling new Data Center licenses entirely. Teams already on Data Center can renew until March 30, 2028 – after which all DC environments switch to read-only mode.

That three-year window has pushed a lot of engineering and product leaders to start evaluating their options seriously, many for the first time in years.

But the Data Center sunset is only part of the story. Separately, AI-native platforms are changing what issue tracking is even for. Jira was built to ensure no request gets lost. The best Jira alternatives in 2026 go further – connecting engineering work to the customers it affects, and using AI that acts rather than just summarises.

This guide compares 14 Jira alternatives and competitors on AI, the pain each solves, seat price, and G2 rating. It also sets out seven criteria to weigh in 2027: customer alignment, AI capability, prioritization, speed of setup, simplicity, migration path, and total cost.

Why do teams look for Jira alternatives?

A Jira alternative is any project management or developer platform that replaces Jira’s issue tracking, sprint planning, and workflow capabilities, usually with simpler setup, better AI, or tighter links to customer-facing teams. Four reasons come up most often: the Data Center sunset, admin overhead, distance from the customer, and tool sprawl.

• The Data Center sunset: Atlassian stopped selling new Data Center licenses to new customers on March 30, 2026. Existing customers can renew or expand until March 30, 2028, and Data Center products and apps become read-only on March 28, 2029. Teams on Jira Cloud aren’t affected by the end of life.
• Operational overhead: Enterprise-grade configuration builds up over time, and a large Jira setup often needs someone to maintain it. A finance manager at a small business writes that “with so many settings, custom fields, and workflow options, it takes time to set up properly” (G2, October 11, 2026).
• Distance from the customer: Every Jira issue lives inside a project. Few carry which customer asked for the work, how much revenue depends on it, or which support ticket started it, so engineers often work without the reason why.
• Tool sprawl: Jira sits in a stack that typically includes Confluence for docs, Jira Service Management for support, and separate planning tools, each priced and integrated on its own. Zendesk’s CX Trends 2026 report found that 74% of consumers get frustrated when asked to repeat themselves, and the same gap shows up between support, product, and engineering.

Jira’s AI has also moved on. Atlassian’s pricing page lists Rovo Search, Chat, and Agents from the Standard plan, with 25 Rovo credits per user per month on Standard and 70 on Premium. The comparison that matters now is whether the AI only summarizes tickets or can reason over customer data and act across connected systems.

Jira remains a strong tracker, so the reasons to compare are practical: a fixed end-of-life date for Data Center, setup and admin work, and issues that sit apart from customer context.

Jira alternatives comparison for 2027

Data from vendor pages and G2. Terms change, so confirm before you buy.

How should you evaluate these Jira alternatives?

Moving off Jira touches every team that files work, so compare the options on the same few points. The table lines up all 14 tools on AI, the pain each solves, seat price, and G2 rating. The seven criteria below are what to weigh when you check each vendor, listed from most to least important for a team that wants engineering tied to customers.

• Customer alignment: Does each issue show which customer asked for it and what revenue sits behind it?
• AI capability: Does the AI summarize tickets, or reason over customer data and write back to connected systems? Look for AI agents that finish the job.
• Prioritization: Is priority derived from linked tickets, opportunities, and revenue, or from stakeholder voting?
• Speed of setup: How long from sign-up to a working sprint?
• Simplicity: Can an engineer use it daily without an admin?
• Migration path: Can you import projects, map custom fields, and run both tools in parallel?
• Total cost: Can you predict the bill across seats, AI add-ons, and credits as the team grows?

How to weight by team stage: startups should lean on speed of setup, simplicity, and cost. Scale-ups should lean on customer alignment, AI capability, and prioritization. Enterprises should lean on the migration path and total cost.

How these tools differ: most are trackers, where each task is the unit, and one connects each task to the customer behind it. That split drives most of the differences in the entries below.

These criteria also apply if you’re comparing bug tracking tools or ticket management software more broadly. Feature lists date fast; these seven criteria hold up.

What are the 14 best Jira alternatives?

1. Computer, by DevRev

Best for: Engineering and product teams at scale-ups and enterprises where customer impact should drive the roadmap.

Computer, by DevRev, is rated 4.3 out of 5 on G2 from 210 reviews.

Where most tools on this list start with a task or a ticket, Computer, by DevRev, starts with the customer. Computer Memory connects product work, support conversations, and engineering issues into one permission-aware knowledge graph, and agents can reason over it and act across connected systems. It is a category shift and not a drop-in Jira replacement.

Key features

• Computer Memory is a permission-aware knowledge graph that links customers, products, support tickets, and engineering issues. Our AI knowledge management guide explains the foundation.
• A customer impact score combines customer and revenue data to rank work, as DevRev’s product-teams page describes.
• Computer AirSync is a two-way sync with systems such as Jira, Salesforce, Zendesk, GitHub, and Slack, and it keeps permissions intact.
• Teams build agent workflows in Agent Studio without code.
• Jira AirSync supports a one-time project import with recipe-based field mapping.
• Agents can be tested in a sandbox on real data before they go live.
• Every action runs inside the person’s permissions, waits for approval on sensitive steps, is logged, and can be rolled back.

Pricing: The pricing for Computer, by DevRev, is custom, so ask DevRev for a quote.

Pros

• Issues link to the customers, tickets, and revenue behind them.
• It can run beside Jira, so engineering can stay in Jira while product and support work in DevRev.

Cons

• It is a platform investment, so setup and onboarding take longer than a lightweight tracker.
• Teams that only need simple sprint tracking will find it more than they need.
• The full value of Computer Memory depends on connecting your customer-facing tools.

Computer, by DevRev, vs. Jira: Jira organizes work as issues in projects, where Computer, by DevRev, connects each issue to the customer, ticket, and revenue context in Computer Memory. Jira Free covers up to 10 people and Standard lists $8.48 per user per month billed monthly for a team of 300, and pricing for Computer, by DevRev, is custom.

What reviewers say

• Love: Breaking down silos. A senior product manager writes that “DevRev’s standout value is how it actively breaks down the traditional silos separating support, product, and engineering” (G2, May 5, 2026; incentivized review).
• Complain: Onboarding takes real effort. The same reviewer writes that “this is absolutely not a plug-and-play solution; initial onboarding requires serious effort” (same review, May 5, 2026).

2. Linear

Best for: Engineering-focused teams that want fast, structured issue management without enterprise overhead.

Linear is rated 4.6 out of 5 on G2 from 125 reviews.

Linear pairs a keyboard-driven interface with an opinionated sprint workflow, which makes it among the most frictionless trackers for pure engineering teams. Our take is that it’s what Jira might look like if engineers rebuilt it for themselves.

Key features

• A keyboard-first interface with a command palette.
• Cycles for sprints, with Linear Insights analytics on Business.
• Triage Intelligence and Code Intelligence on Business, and Linear Agent on the free plan.
• Zendesk and Intercom integrations on Business.

Pricing: Free is $0 with 250 issues and two teams. Basic is $10 and Business is $16 per user per month billed yearly. Enterprise is custom, with annual billing only. Linear’s page shows no monthly prices.

Pros

• A free plan and clear per-user prices.
• Built for fast engineering workflows.

Cons

• Free is capped at 250 issues and two teams.
• Docs and roadmapping are lighter than in ClickUp or Notion.
• Issues don’t carry customer or revenue context by default.

Linear vs. Jira: Linear is built for speed and a lean engineering workflow, where Jira is built for configurable workflows across teams.

What reviewers say

• Love: Speed and keyboard control. A support agent at a mid-market company writes that “Linear is built to be navigated almost entirely without a mouse” (G2, July 15, 2026).
• Complain: Limited customization. The same reviewer writes that “Linear is opinionated by design, which is great for speed but can be frustrating if your team’s workflow doesn’t fit its assumptions” (same review, July 15, 2026).

3. ClickUp

Best for: Mixed organizations where engineering, product, marketing, and operations share one work surface.

ClickUp is rated 4.6 out of 5 on G2 from 15,008 reviews.

ClickUp consolidates tasks, docs, goals, and time tracking into a single platform. The range of views is among the broadest on this list, and configuring it for a focused engineering workflow takes effort.

Key features

• Spaces, Folders, and Lists that mirror team structures.
• Native time tracking from Unlimited, and dashboards and sprint points on Business.
• Brain AI as an add-on, with AI Super Credits at $10 per 10,000.
• SAML SSO, SCIM, audit log, and data residency on Enterprise.

Pricing: Free Forever is $0. Unlimited is $7 and Business is $12 per user per month billed yearly ($10 and $19 billed monthly). Brain AI adds $9 and Everything AI adds $28 per user per month. Enterprise is custom.

Pros

• A free plan and a low entry price.
• One surface for several teams.

Cons

• AI is a separate per-user add-on.
• Setting it up for a focused engineering workflow takes effort.

ClickUp vs. Jira: ClickUp spreads one workspace across many functions, where Jira centers on software teams and agile workflows.

What reviewers say

• Love: One workspace. A software engineer at a mid-market company writes that ClickUp “replaces multiple separate tools by combining task management, Docs, whiteboards, time tracking, and chat in one workspace” (G2, October 19, 2026).
• Complain: Steep learning curve. The same reviewer writes, “The sheer volume of features, hierarchy levels, and settings can overwhelm new team members, requiring significant onboarding time” (same review, October 19, 2026).

4. Asana

Best for: Organizations where engineering is part of a broader cross-functional operation, such as launches and go-to-market planning.

Asana is rated 4.4 out of 5 on G2 from 14,040 reviews.

Asana is a mature project management platform for structured work where stakeholder visibility matters. It wasn’t designed as an engineering tracker, and that shows in sprint-specific workflows.

Key features

• List, board, timeline, calendar, and Gantt views.
• Portfolios, goals, and resource management on Advanced.
• AI Teammates and Asana Dash, with AI Studio credits by plan.
• Salesforce, Tableau, and Power BI support on Advanced.

Pricing: Personal is free for up to two people. Starter is $10.99 and Advanced is $24.99 per user per month billed annually ($13.49 and $30.49 billed monthly). Enterprise is custom. AI requests are $0.50 each when pre-paid and $0.60 pay as you go.

Pros

• Strong timeline and portfolio views.
• A free plan and published prices for both paid tiers.

Cons

• Not purpose-built for sprint-based engineering.
• Starter and Advanced include five AI requests per user per month, with extra requests billed.

Asana vs. Jira: Asana suits structured cross-functional planning, where Jira suits sprint-based software delivery.

What reviewers say

• Love: Organized and collaborative. A marketing operations specialist at a mid-market company writes, “The ability to keep all my tasks organized while also being able to collaborate with others at the same time” (G2, October 9, 2026).
• Complain: Inconsistent rules. The same reviewer writes, “The inconsistency of how things are applied” (same review, October 9, 2026).

5. Monday.com

Best for: Teams whose work spans several functions and that value dashboards and visual workflows.

Monday.com is rated 4.7 out of 5 on G2 from 17,284 reviews, under G2’s monday AI Work Platform listing.

Monday.com is a work management platform with a visual board interface and a dashboard builder. Monday dev extends it to product development with sprint planning and a roadmap view.

Key features

• Customizable boards, with Timeline, Gantt, and Calendar views from Standard.
• Monday dev adds sprint management, a single roadmap, and GitHub two-way sync from Standard.
• AI credits by plan, from 1,000 a month on Basic.
• Customer feedback management on monday dev Pro.

Pricing: Work management is $9 (Basic), $12 (Standard), or $19 (Pro) per seat per month billed annually, with a free plan for up to two seats. Plans start from three seats. Monday dev is $9, $12, or $20 per seat. Enterprise is a custom quote.

Pros

• A free plan and published prices for each tier.
• Flexible views and dashboards.

Cons

• Paid plans start at three seats.
• Engineering depth sits in monday dev, a separate product from work management.

Monday.com vs. Jira: Monday.com is built for flexible, visual workflows across functions, where Jira is built for agile and DevOps teams.

What reviewers say

• Love: Flexible, not complicated. A virtual librarian at a mid-market company writes, “What I like best is how flexible it is without becoming complicated” (G2, September 24, 2026).
• Complain: Pricing scales quickly. The same reviewer writes, “The biggest drawback is that the pricing scales quickly” (same review, September 24, 2026).

6. Shortcut

Best for: Engineering teams of roughly 5 to 30 people that want clear structure without enterprise complexity.

Shortcut is rated 4.4 out of 5 on G2 from 177 reviews.

Shortcut, formerly Clubhouse, is more structured than Trello and lighter than Jira. It covers Stories, Epics, Milestones, and Iterations without the configuration overhead.

Key features

• Kanban views, Roadmap, Reports, and Iterations on the free plan.
• GitHub, Slack, and Figma integrations.
• Automations and multiple workflows from Team.
• AI Agent Collaboration and an MCP Server.

Pricing: Free is $0 for up to 10 people. Team is $8.50 and Business is $12 per user per month. Shortcut’s page shows one price per plan, so confirm the billing cycle. Enterprise is custom.

Pros

• A free plan for up to 10 people and low per-user prices.
• Built for engineering teams.

Cons

• Team supports up to five teams.
• Docs and knowledge management are limited, so many teams keep a separate docs tool.

Shortcut vs. Jira: Shortcut offers Jira-like structure with less configuration, where Jira offers deeper customization and a larger ecosystem.

What reviewers say

• Love: MCP server. A VP of engineering at a small business writes, “I’ve integrated Shortcut heavily with GitHub, and I find the MCP server really helpful, especially because it allows integration with Claude and has write access” (G2, April 28, 2026).
• Complain: Search. The same reviewer writes, “I think some of the search features could be improved right now” (same review, April 28, 2026).

7. Wrike

Best for: Enterprise organizations with large, distributed teams that need project management across departments.

Wrike is rated 4.2 out of 5 on G2 from 4,548 reviews.

Wrike is positioned at the enterprise end of the market. Its resource management, time tracking, and approval workflows are more developed than most tools on this list, and it serves many industries beyond software.

Key features

• Gantt charts, resource management, and workload balancing.
• AI Essentials on Team, and AI Elite actions from Business.
• Proofing and approval workflows.
• Wrike Whiteboard as a $15 per user add-on.

Pricing: Free is $0. Team is $10 per user per month for 2 to 15 seats, and Business is $25 for 5 to 200 seats, billed annually. Pinnacle and Apex are by contact, and Business and above are annual-only.

Pros

• Strong resource planning and approvals.
• AI actions included from Business, with no separate purchase.

Cons

• Business and above are annual-only.
• Team and Business have seat bands, so growth means moving up a plan.

Wrike vs. Jira: Wrike centers on cross-department programs and resource planning, where Jira centers on software delivery.

What reviewers say

• Love: Gantt charts. A manager at a mid-market company writes, “I really like the Gantt implementation in Wrike; it’s one of the best I’ve used on the web” (G2, September 27, 2026).
• Complain: Learning curve. The same reviewer writes, “The learning curve is steep” (same review, September 27, 2026).

8. Zoho Sprints

Best for: Small engineering teams on tight budgets, especially those already in the Zoho suite.

Zoho Sprints is rated 4.5 out of 5 on G2 from 184 reviews.

Zoho Sprints is a dedicated agile tool inside the Zoho ecosystem, which includes CRM and helpdesk. It covers backlogs, sprints, and velocity tracking.

Key features

• Backlog management with story points and sprint planning.
• Velocity and burndown reporting.
• Integration with Zoho CRM and Zoho Desk.
• Timesheets built in.

Pricing: Free covers 3 people and 3 projects. Starter is ₹70 per user per month billed annually, for 12 to 100 seats and 50 projects. Elite is ₹175 billed annually (₹210 monthly), Premier is ₹350 (₹420), and Enterprise is ₹525 (₹630), all with no upper user limit. Local taxes are added.

Pros

• A free plan and low-cost agile tracking.
• Natural fit for teams already on Zoho.

Cons

• No AI features listed on its pricing page.
• Starter covers 12 to 100 seats.
• Integrations outside the Zoho ecosystem are lighter.

Zoho Sprints vs. Jira: Zoho Sprints covers the core agile workflow at a lower cost, where Jira offers a larger app ecosystem.

What reviewers say

• Love: Affordable Scrum. A product manager at a small business writes, “Helps run our Scrum without burning our pockets” (G2, September 9, 2025).
• Complain: Customization. The same reviewer writes, “Not as customizable as Monday.com” (same review, September 9, 2025).

9. Notion

Best for: Teams where writing, documentation, and knowledge management matter as much as task tracking.

Notion is a flexible, document-centric workspace with a structured database layer. Product teams use it to manage roadmaps beside documentation. As a pure Jira replacement for sprint-based engineering, it is a stretch.

Notion is rated 4.6 out of 5 on G2 from 13,878 reviews, under G2’s Notion listing, which covers Notion AI.

Key features

• Databases with table, board, gallery, calendar, and timeline views.
• Notion AI, with Notion Agent on Business.
• Linked databases across pages.
• Templates for sprint planning, roadmaps, and product specs.

Pricing: Free is $0, Plus is $10, and Business is $20 per member per month. Notion’s page doesn’t say which billing cycle those prices assume, and it offers up to 20% off for yearly payment. Custom Agents cost $10 per 1,000 Notion credits after the free trial.

Pros

• A free plan and a published price for each tier.
• Docs and tracking in one workspace.

Cons

• Not purpose-built for sprint-based engineering.
• AI works across Notion, not across other connected systems.

Notion vs. Jira: Notion leads with docs and flexible databases, where Jira leads with issue workflows and sprints.

What reviewers say

• Love: Connected records. A software developer at a mid-market company writes, “With Databases, Relations, and Rollups, we can connect RFCs, projects, tasks, incidents, and technical documentation without having to copy the same context into multiple places” (G2, September 28, 2026).
• Complain: Automation limits. The same reviewer writes, “Notion’s automation layer has some limits that start to show once a workflow becomes more complex” (same review, September 28, 2026).

10. Azure DevOps

Best for: Software teams already working in Microsoft’s development stack.

G2’s Azure DevOps Server listing shows 4.2 out of 5 from 201 reviews. G2 lists the self-hosted Server product.

Azure DevOps Services bundles boards, pipelines, and artifact storage under Microsoft’s pricing. Visual Studio subscribers get free access, and GitHub Enterprise Cloud customers who manage accounts with Entra ID can use it at no additional cost.

Key features

• Free Stakeholder access, and Basic seats from $6 each after the first five.
• Azure Pipelines with one free Microsoft-hosted parallel job at 1,800 minutes a month.
• Azure Artifacts with 2 GiB free.
• GitHub Advanced Security add-ons, priced per committer.

Pricing: The first five Basic seats are free, then $6 per user per month. Basic plus Test Plans is $52 per user per month. Extra Microsoft-hosted parallel jobs are $40, and extra self-hosted jobs are $15.

Pros

• The first five seats are free.
• Pipelines and artifacts sit next to the work items.

Cons

• Strongest for teams already in Microsoft’s stack.
• Test Plans, extra pipelines, and security add-ons are priced separately.

Azure DevOps vs. Jira: Azure DevOps ties issue tracking to Microsoft’s build and release tools, where Jira works with many developer environments.

What reviewers say

• Love: Whole lifecycle in one place. A software development engineer in test at a mid-market company writes, “What I like most is how ADO brings our entire SDLC under one roof, end to end” (G2, January 26, 2026).
• Complain: Pipeline agent security. The same reviewer writes, “My main concern is pipeline agent security” (same review, January 26, 2026).

11. Trello

Best for: Teams that want lightweight Kanban boards and simple task tracking.

Trello is rated 4.4 out of 5 on G2 from 14,064 reviews.

Trello is a board-based task tool and the simplest option on this list. It sits at the opposite end from Jira’s configurable workflows.

Key features

• Boards, with unlimited boards from Standard and 10 on Free.
• Workspace command runs for automation: 250 a month on Free, 1,000 on Standard, and unlimited on Premium.
• AI included from Standard.
• Partner Power-Ups, some with an extra fee.

Pricing: Free is $0 for up to 10 collaborators per Workspace. Standard is $5 billed annually ($6 monthly), Premium is $10 ($12.50 monthly), and Enterprise is $17.50 billed annually. Atlassian Guard is a separate subscription.

Pros

• A free plan and the lowest paid prices on this list.
• Fast to learn.

Cons

• Free is limited to 10 boards and 250 automation runs a month.
• Some Power-Ups cost extra.

Trello vs. Jira: Trello offers simple boards and low prices, where Jira offers sprint planning, configurable workflows, and a larger ecosystem.

What reviewers say

• Love: Visual workflow. A technical project manager at a small business writes, “Trello’s board-and-card system makes it incredibly easy to visualize workflow stages at a glance” (G2, August 1, 2026).
• Complain: Pricing at scale. The same reviewer writes, “The pricing structure becomes a real consideration once you scale past a small team” (same review, August 1, 2026).

12. Smartsheet

Best for: Teams that track portfolios in a spreadsheet-style interface with strong automation.

Smartsheet is rated 4.4 out of 5 on G2 from 22,813 reviews.

Smartsheet combines a familiar grid with project and portfolio tracking. It serves business teams more than engineering teams.

Key features

• Smart Assist, Smart Columns, an AI dashboard builder, and formula generation.
• MCP-enabled connections to external AI tools on Business.
• Unlimited automations on Business and above, and 250 a month on Pro.
• 1 TB of attachment storage on Business.

Pricing: Pro is $9 per member per month billed yearly ($12 monthly) for 1 to 10 members, and only for new customers. Business is $19 ($24 monthly) for 3 or more members. Enterprise, for 10 or more members, and Advanced Work Management are custom.

Pros

• Published prices for Pro and Business, with AI on both.
• Strong automation on higher plans.

Cons

• Business starts at three members, and Enterprise at ten.
• Built for business teams, so sprint-specific engineering features aren’t its focus.

Smartsheet vs. Jira: Smartsheet tracks work in a spreadsheet-style grid across business teams, where Jira tracks software work in issues and sprints.

What reviewers say

• Love: Familiar like Excel. A senior manager at a mid-market company writes, “I appreciate that Smartsheet feels familiar because it is similar to Excel, which makes it relatively easy to learn and navigate” (G2, August 21, 2026).
• Complain: One sheet per tab. The same reviewer writes, “I wish Smartsheet allowed multiple tabs within a single document, similar to an Excel workbook” (same review, August 21, 2026).

13. Basecamp

Best for: Small teams that want simple collaboration and a predictable flat price.

Basecamp is rated 4.1 out of 5 on G2 from 5,486 reviews.

Basecamp bundles message boards, to-dos, card tables, scheduling, and docs in one place. It prices by plan and not by seat.

Key features

• Message boards, to-dos, card tables, campfires, scheduling, and docs on every plan.
• Bring-your-own AI agents, with CLI access and skills, plus ChatGPT and Claude connectors on every plan.
• Time tracking and project templates.
• Active-project limits by plan, from 1 on Free to unlimited.

Pricing: Free is $0 for 1 project and up to 5 people. Freelancer is $25 a month for 3 projects, Studio is $59 for 10, and Pro is $99 for 25. Unlimited is $299 a month billed annually, with unlimited projects.

Pros

• Flat plan prices that don’t grow with each seat on higher plans.
• A free plan and connectors for ChatGPT and Claude.

Cons

• Free allows one project, and each plan caps active projects.
• The feature list centers on collaboration and lists no sprint or velocity tools.

Basecamp vs. Jira: Basecamp keeps collaboration in one flat-priced space, where Jira adds issue types, workflows, and sprint reporting.

What reviewers say

• Love: Everything in view. A full stack engineer at a mid-market company writes, “Projects, tasks, messages, files, and schedules are all right there, without layers of menus or hidden settings to figure out” (G2, June 19, 2026).
• Complain: Simplicity as a limit. The same reviewer writes, “Basecamp’s biggest strength is also its biggest limitation: simplicity” (same review, June 19, 2026).

14. Zoho Projects

Best for: Budget-conscious teams already in the Zoho suite who need general project management.

Zoho Projects is rated 4.4 out of 5 on G2 from 570 reviews.

Zoho Projects is the broader Zoho project tool, where Zoho Sprints is the agile one. Its AI comes from Zia.

Key features

• Free for up to five people, with 3 projects and 5 GB of storage.
• Premium adds unlimited projects, budgeting, time logs, and timesheets.
• Enterprise adds single sign-on, critical path and baselines, and a sandbox.
• Zia summaries, Translate, task and subtask creation, and Insights, plus a Zoho MCP Server.

Pricing: Free covers up to 5 people. Premium is ₹280 per user per month billed annually (₹350 monthly), Enterprise is ₹630 (₹700), and Ultimate is ₹980 (₹1,050). Local taxes are added.

Pros

• A free plan, with unlimited projects on Premium.
• Natural fit for teams on Zoho.

Cons

• Free allows 50 workflow action runs a month.
• Prices rise steeply across tiers, from ₹280 on Premium to ₹980 on Ultimate.

Zoho Projects vs. Jira: Zoho Projects covers general project management with budgeting and time tracking, where Jira focuses on issue tracking for software teams.

What reviewers say

• Love: Customization. A CTO and founder at a small business writes, “The level of customization is what stands out most for me, especially with features like custom workflows, detailed Gantt charts, and time tracking” (G2, July 9, 2026).
• Complain: Crowded interface. The same reviewer writes that “the user interface can feel a bit overwhelming with so many features” (same review, July 9, 2026).

Other Jira alternatives worth considering

These tools came up less often, so we left them out of the table. Each one fits a specific need.

• Teamwork is built for agencies and client-services teams, with invoicing, a client portal, and profitability tracking. It has no sprint management, so it is a different category from Jira. It lists a free plan for up to five people, Basics at $9.99, and Accelerate at $24.99 per user per month billed annually.
• GitLab, YouTrack, and Plane are developer-focused: GitLab combines issues with source control and CI/CD, YouTrack offers Jira-style issue tracking and agile boards, and Plane is open source and self-hostable.
• OpenProject is an open-source project management tool with self-hosting for teams that need data control.

How do you move off Jira?

The migration question stalls most evaluations, so it helps to see the three real paths. Jira AirSync, DevRev’s connector for Jira Software, supports a one-time project import and a two-way sync.

Option 1: Full migration

This fits when Data Center end of life is the forcing function. Jira AirSync supports a one-time bulk import of a project, with a recipe that maps fields, including custom fields. Sprints, filters, and automations aren’t synced, so those need rebuilding.

Option 2: Coexistence through AirSync

Computer AirSync runs a two-way sync with Jira, so product and customer-success teams can work in DevRev while engineering stays in Jira. Issues sync both ways, and the DevRev for Jira app, installed from the Atlassian Marketplace, shows DevRev tickets inside Jira. AirSync syncs periodically, once an hour by default, so changes arrive in near real time and not instantly. You can run both indefinitely, or use coexistence as the on-ramp to a full migration.

Option 3: Phased rollout

Start with one customer-adjacent team, such as customer-success engineering or one product area, and move other teams as adoption shows. This is the safest path for large Jira deployments.

Three conditions that keep the move low-risk

A move carries little risk when:

• The new tool can import your projects and map your custom fields.
• The vendor offers a trial or proof of concept on your data.
• Both tools can run in parallel for a few weeks before you cut over.

When all three hold, the migration risk is manageable.

How do you choose a Jira alternative?

Team stage, budget, and how much customer context you need cut a long list down fast. Fourteen Jira alternatives is a manageable list, so narrow it on those three.

• By team stage: Linear, Shortcut, and Zoho Sprints suit small engineering teams. Computer, by DevRev, suits scale-ups and enterprises where customer impact drives the roadmap, and Wrike suits large cross-department programs.
• By budget: Linear, Shortcut, Asana, Monday.com, Zoho Sprints, Notion, Trello, Basecamp, and Zoho Projects list free plans, and Azure DevOps includes five free Basic seats. Jira lists a free plan for up to 10 people. Pricing for Computer, by DevRev, is custom, so ask DevRev for a quote based on your team size.
• If you want pure speed and a keyboard-first workflow: Linear.
• If you need one work surface across several teams: ClickUp, Asana, or Monday.com.
• If you want something simple and cheap: Trello or Basecamp.
• If you work in the Microsoft stack: Azure DevOps.
• If you want to stay on Jira: Jira Cloud still fits teams that need Jira-native enterprise features, and it now includes Rovo AI from Standard.

Stage and budget narrow the choice, but one question settles it: does your tracker need to know which customer an issue affects and what revenue sits behind it? That question picks the tool.

Why is Computer, by DevRev, our pick?

Three things set Computer, by DevRev, apart from the trackers on this list, and each one is checkable.

• It connects each issue to the customer. Computer Memory links customers, support tickets, and engineering issues, so priority can follow linked tickets and revenue and not stakeholder voting.
• It has been tested at volume. In BILL’s pre-launch test on 200,000 real customer queries, it reached a 70% resolution rate against a 30% approval threshold.
• It writes back inside guardrails. Actions run inside the person’s permissions, pause for approval on sensitive steps, are logged, and can be undone.

Choose Computer, by DevRev, if engineering work needs to connect directly to customer impact and you want an agent that writes back to your systems as well as summarizing.

Computer, by DevRev ties each issue to the customer behind it. That’s Work Softer: less guessing, clearer priorities.